<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Xplico &#187; Note</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.xplico.org/archives/category/improvements/note/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.xplico.org</link>
	<description>Internet Traffic Decoder. Network Forensic Analysis Tool (NFAT)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 22:47:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>SniffJoke 0.2</title>
		<link>http://www.xplico.org/archives/185</link>
		<comments>http://www.xplico.org/archives/185#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 21:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gianluca C.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Note]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xplico.org/?p=185</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An example of the effectiveness of SniffJoke is given by this pcap. It is easy to verify that Wireshark and other tools reconstruct the data entering the traffic generated by SbiffJoke, making reconstruction wrong.
Try this pcap&#8230; with your best tool.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.xplico.org/archives/185/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
